SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [chat] LGPL license w/o GPL infection
- To: slug-chat@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chat] LGPL license w/o GPL infection
- From: invisible ink <jdub@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Oct 15 00:47:02 2001
- Reply-by: Thu Oct 18 00:48:53 EST 2001
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
begin Andre Pang quotation:
> I want others to be able to use it, as they would a product under the BSD
> or MIT license. What I _don't_ want is them gleefully modifying my source
> code and not giving those modifications back to me, because then whatever
> modifications they create won't be passed back to everybody else. Share
> and care!
:D :D :D
Same reason for the oft-flamed LGPL'ed GNOME libraries. Where does your
requirement for static linking come in, though? Hacking up stuff that might
be useful in embedded apps?
> Thanks heaps for your help on this, Jeff! Maybe I'll actually
> start working on the code before the night is over :).
Hahaha. First things first, eh? ;)
Penguinillas Pack GNUzis