Re: [chat] LGPL license w/o GPL infection

[Catie Flick <liedra@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 15 Oct, I wrote:

> Not really, if you look at how RMS markets the GPL (especially consider
> RMS vs. O'Reilly on the definition of "freedom" wrt free software).

Erm, to clarify:
http://linux.oreillynet.com/pub/a/linux/2001/08/15/free_software.html

C.

-- 
<Styx> Quoth the raven, /ignore
--
http://www.liedra.net