Re: [chat] Re: [SLUG] List Policy

[invisible ink <jdub@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

begin  Mary Gardiner  quotation:

> It's useful for stopping large attachments, eg SirCam, although Mailman
> also holds > 40kb messages for approval[1], and does catch the occasional
> bit of spam. It has changed the signal to noise ratio not a jot.

We do most of that with filters; I'm always very surprised to see a spam
come through to the list because we have to moderate and discard so many.

> [1] The last time SirCam came through though, one of the admins appears
> to have approved the half-a-meg post. No one owned up.

Heh, blame attribution (real logins) and an event log on the web interface
would be really cool.

- ii

-- 
  Penguinillas Pack GNUzis