SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [chat] Re: [SLUG] List Policy
- To: slug-chat@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chat] Re: [SLUG] List Policy
- From: invisible ink <jdub@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Oct 7 16:23:02 2001
- Reply-by: Wed Oct 10 16:25:23 EST 2001
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
begin Mary Gardiner quotation:
> It's useful for stopping large attachments, eg SirCam, although Mailman
> also holds > 40kb messages for approval, and does catch the occasional
> bit of spam. It has changed the signal to noise ratio not a jot.
We do most of that with filters; I'm always very surprised to see a spam
come through to the list because we have to moderate and discard so many.
>  The last time SirCam came through though, one of the admins appears
> to have approved the half-a-meg post. No one owned up.
Heh, blame attribution (real logins) and an event log on the web interface
would be really cool.
Penguinillas Pack GNUzis