SLUG Mailing List ArchivesOn Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 08:30:41AM +1000, Peter Hardy uttered:
> > Should be more than sufficient, given a non-brain dead shell like bash or zsh.
>
> I know. It's been mentioned in other replies already.
>
> But I also wrote:
> > To which I declare that the most obfuscated solution wins the approval of
> > one's peers. Or, at least, me.
>
> I was going to try to point out that it's just for a little bit of fun, and
> that it's very easy to forget an authentication system I'm not using at one
> am, but instead I'll just say:
>
Hah.
> <? echo (get_current_user()); ?>
>
*shiver* PHP.
Which is A) Evil. B) Should be shot. And how will that work at all? It'll
just return the UID of the owner of the webserver, no?
--
Steve
* aj thinks Kb^Zzz ought to pick different things to dream about than
general resolutions and policy changes.
<Kb^Zzz> aj - tell me about it, this is a Bad Sign
Attachment:
pgpuWny8sYDcP.pgp
Description: PGP signature