Re: [activities] Re: [SLUG] Motion to be put at the AGM: Wind up SLUG

[Mary Gardiner <mary@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

James Polley wrote:
> But an essential part of that is winding up the organisation currently known
> as SLUG, and that's what the motion is about.

For the record, although this is a very minor matter to me personally, I also
initially read the subject line as "end the entire group known as SLUG, cease
all activities", not "wind up the incorporated association, leave the group
continuing similar activities with less overhead". Obviously the message
contents made it clear.

-Mary